By Thomas Piecha, Peter Schroeder-Heister

This quantity is the 1st ever assortment dedicated to the sector of proof-theoretic semantics. Contributions handle subject matters together with the systematics of creation and removing ideas and proofs of normalization, the categorial characterization of deductions, the relation among Heyting's and Gentzen's methods to that means, knowability paradoxes, proof-theoretic foundations of set idea, Dummett's justification of logical legislation, Kreisel's idea of buildings, paradoxical reasoning, and the defence of version theory.

The box of proof-theoretic semantics has existed for nearly 50 years, however the time period itself was once proposed via Schroeder-Heister within the Nineteen Eighties. Proof-theoretic semantics explains the that means of linguistic expressions commonly and of logical constants specifically when it comes to the idea of facts. This quantity emerges from shows on the moment foreign convention on Proof-Theoretic Semantics in Tübingen in 2013, the place contributing authors have been requested to supply a self-contained description and research of an important examine query during this zone. The contributions are consultant of the sphere and will be of curiosity to logicians, philosophers, and mathematicians alike.

Show description

Read or Download Advances in Proof-Theoretic Semantics PDF

Similar semantics books

Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First Phase Syntax

Книга Verb which means and the Lexicon: a primary part Syntax Verb that means and the Lexicon: a primary part Syntax Книги Иностранные языки Автор: Gillian Catriona Ramchand Год издания: 2008 Формат: pdf Издат. :Cambridge collage Press Страниц: 228 Размер: 1,2 ISBN: 0521842409 Язык: Английский0 (голосов: zero) Оценка:The courting among the that means of phrases and the constitution of sentences is a crucial sector of study in linguistics.

Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning: Neo-Gricean studies in pragmatics and semantics in honor of Laurence R. Horn (Studies in Language Companion Series)

Probably the most full of life and contentious matters in modern linguistic concept issues the elusive boundary among semantics and pragmatics, and Professor Laurence R. Horn of Yale collage has been on the heart of that discuss ever on the grounds that his groundbreaking 1972 UCLA dissertation. This quantity in honor of Horn brings jointly the easiest of present paintings on the semantics/pragmatics boundary from a neo-Gricean standpoint.

Morpheme Order and Semantic Scope: Word Formation in the Athapaskan Verb

Athapaskan languages are of significant linguistic curiosity as a result of their tricky morphology. during this transparent and insightful booklet, Keren Rice bargains a wealthy survey of morpheme ordering in Athapaskan verbs, with implications for either synchronic grammar and language swap. She argues that verb constitution is predictable throughout Athapaskan languages if definite summary points of that means are thought of.

Roots and Patterns: Hebrew Morpho-syntax

This e-book is at the same time a theoretical learn in morphosyntax and an in-depth empirical research of Hebrew. in line with Hebrew info, the publication defends the prestige of the foundation as a lexical and phonological unit and argues that roots, instead of verbs or nouns, are the primitives of notice formation. A critical declare made during the publication is the function of locality in notice formation, teasing aside be aware formation from roots and observe formation from latest phrases syntactically, semantically and phonologically.

Additional resources for Advances in Proof-Theoretic Semantics

Sample text

But now note that since y was arbitrary in the foregoing reasoning, we should additionally be able to conclude by universal generalization that (3 ) ∀y¬R( f (x) = 0, y) Noting that the foregoing reasoning is also uniform in the variable x, we also ought to be able to internalize it in a manner analogous to Int. Doing so yields the existence of a function g(x) such that (3 ) R(∀y¬R( f (x) = 0, y), g(x)) By substituting g for x in (3 ) we obtain R(∀y¬R( f (g) = 0, y), g(g)). But then again taking x = g in (1 ) and applying modus ponens yields (4 ) f (g) = 0 which can be seen as analogous to step (4) in the derivation of Montague’s paradox.

It is in this regard that Weinstein suggests that intuitionism may have an advantage over finitism in the sense that the BHK clauses can be understood as providing a uniform semantic account applicable to both real and ideal mathematical statements. As he stresses in the following passage, however, this advantage can only be claimed if it is ensured that the proof relation is decidable: Proofs, for the intuitionist, are not to be equated with formal proofs, that is with some kind of finite quasi-perceptual objects, and, more to the point, decidable properties of proofs may involve considerations about the intuitive content of these mathematical constructions.

2 Predicativity, Decidability, and the BHK Interpretation One of Kreisel’s goals in proposing the Theory of Constructions was to respond to a potential objection to the BHK interpretation which had been raised by Gödel. This problem can be understood to arise in two stages. First note that the BHK clauses initially appear to provide a characterization of the relation “ p is a proof of A” in terms of the logical form of A, an observation which might in turn be taken to provide an implicit definition of the class of constructive proofs to which the interpretation refers.

Download PDF sample

Advances in Proof-Theoretic Semantics by Thomas Piecha, Peter Schroeder-Heister
Rated 4.59 of 5 – based on 3 votes